5-Word 365 #334 – Murder At 1600

It’s actually quite tricky to write extensively about a film you have no real feelings about one way or the other.

Murder at 1600murder_at_1600_poster

Political intrigue meets renegade cop.

There’s been a murder at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC. Local homicide detective Regis is assigned to investigate, along with his Secret Service liaison Agent Nina Chance. As the tenacious Regis digs deeper, he discovers that what at first seems like a simple crime of passion is actually part of a larger conspiracy that could go all the way to the yadda, yadda, yadda. Blah.

Released back in 1997, when Wesley Snipes still seemed to be enjoying going to work in the morning, Murder at 1600 was a part of that short-lived reheat of the conspiracy thriller sub-genre (see Conspiracy Theory, Absolute Power, Shadow Conspiracy. Or, you know, don’t.) that popped up in the second half of the nineties. Fuelled by all that millennium tension horseshit, these flicks – often adaptations of novels – tried to capture that seventies paranoia that was a major part of movies like The Parallax View, Three Days of the Condor and Coma (to name but a few). Most only partially succeeded, and the ones that did tended to be the ones with the biggest stars; Mel Gibson and Clint Eastwood did alright, Charlie Sheen not so much. This one is kind of a middling effort, with ticks in both the plus and the minus columns.

Supercop meets Bald of Awesome

Supercop meets Bald of Awesome

On the plus side, there’s that cast. You’ve got Snipes showing off underdog charisma in the lead role, with Diane Lane being her usual top-notch self as Chance. They’re both good individually, but it’s a shame they never really spark as a team. Daniel Benzali – fresh from the TV mega-hit Murder One – and Alan Alda class the joint up as the Secret Service director and National Security Adviser respectively, and Ronny Cox is a respectable President. The screenplay, by Wayne Beach and David Hodgin, is based on a novel by Margaret Truman (Harry’s daughter), which adds a certain insider cachet to proceedings. The flick is competently shot by director Dwight Little and his DP Steven Bernstein.

On the other side of the ledger, there’s the fact that, as determined as they always are to surprise you, if you’ve seen one of these movies you’ve seen them all. By the time the opening credits had finished, I knew exactly how the film was going to end. If there is no mystery to a conspiracy thriller then it is very hard to keep the drama going. Without the conspiracy part, all that’s left is the thriller: shoot-outs; chases; ticking clocks… And even those moments didn’t really get the blood pumping.

Wesley and Diane try to dodge the bad guys, while Dennis gets in some practice for his weekend gig as a catalogue model.

Wesley and Diane try to dodge the bad guys, while Dennis gets in some practice for his weekend gig as a catalogue model.

To most people, Murder at 1600 will just be another forgotten, late-nineties movie that passes the time well enough if it crops up on TV. It was never going to win any awards, nor make any “best of” lists, but it’s no embarrassment either. It’s not good enough or bad enough to get really excited about.

Oh, just one more thing. The White House is federal property, right? Wouldn’t it be the FBI’s case instead of some local cop?

4 comments

  1. theipc · November 30, 2012

    Is this the “always bet on black” movie??

    • Ryan McNeely · November 30, 2012

      No, that was the wonderful trash of Passenger 57. I love that flick

      • theipc · November 30, 2012

        HA! Ah yes!

  2. rmstock · December 1, 2013

    “Wesley and Diane try to dodge the bad guys, while Dennis gets in some practice for his weekend gig as a catalogue model.”

    Hey dude, the bad guys in this scene are just two local DC policemen on extra patrol as the President is about to announce his forced resignation. You are really downplaying this movie with no ground to support it. When authorities are becoming corrupted, the interest of solving homicide and murder cases tends to drop to zero. Enter Wesley Snipes. The first thing Spikings (Daniel Benzali), the Ueber Homeland Security chief aka Chief Security Agent of the White House hisses with his liquor voice to Snipes upon entering the crime scene : “You’re not cleared” “Who invited you in here anyway?”, “We did” says National Security Adviser Jordan (Alan Alda), as he assumes that the inexperienced young copper will beautifully buy into the trail of cover-up evidence that was planted. But the really murky detail of Murder at 1600 is inside the end-titling : “In Memory of David Hodgin”, the co-writer of the movie who died two years earlier under strange circumstances from a heart failure

Go ahead, punk. Make my day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s