Human Centipede II: Banned

Like 1984 All Over Again?

The British Board of Film Classification announced today that it will not be certifying Tom Six’s Human Centipede II for distribution in the UK. The film will be banned, and supplying it on DVD will be illegal. Local Councils can overrule this decision, within their own jurisdiction, but only for cinema screenings.

This is a big step for the BBFC under the current regime. The last time they banned a movie outright, as far as I’m aware, was Grotesque in 2009 – a Japanese torture-porn effort that really lives up to its name by all accounts. A lot of films might have cuts suggested in order to receive the certificate the distributor wants, but a total rejection is a big deal and harkens back to the Board’s original moniker (The C used to stand for Censors).

Time for the history class. By 1984, I mean of course the Video Recordings Act, which is the legislation around which the BBFC writes their guidelines. This law was the result of the “video nasties” brouhaha inflamed by Mary Whitehouse and the Daily Mail back in 1982. Yes, I said video nasties. Everyone take a drink.

Here’s the big fucking fly in the ointment though: the internet. A ban in 1984 meant nobody would see your grubby little film without some help from a shady guy at the local rental place and his mate on the continent. Today, a ban means next to nothing. The film will be online in its complete form before you know it, and anyone who wants to see it will see it after an hour or so for the download. The only people who will be affected by this ban in any real terms will be the people who expect to make some money from the release.

Here’s the complete release from the BBFC (warning: contains spoilers) (like that matters). Those of you with small children in the room may wish to change the channel.

The first film dealt with a mad doctor who sews together three kidnapped people in order to produce the ‘human centipede’of the title. Although the concept of the film was undoubtedly tasteless and disgusting it was a relatively traditional and conventional horror film and the Board concluded that it was not in breach of our Guidelines at ‘18’. This new work, The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence), tells the story of a man who becomes sexually obsessed with a DVD recording of the first film and who imagines putting the ‘centipede’ idea into practice. Unlike the first film, the sequel presents graphic images of sexual violence, forced defecation, and mutilation, and the viewer is invited to witness events from the perspective of the protagonist. Whereas in the first film the ‘centipede’ idea is presented as a revolting medical experiment, with the focus on whether the victims will be able to escape, this sequel presents the ‘centipede’ idea as the object of the protagonist’s depraved sexual fantasy.

The principal focus of The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) is the sexual arousal of the central character at both the idea and the spectacle of the total degradation, humiliation, mutilation, torture, and murder of his naked victims. Examples of this include a scene early in the film in which he masturbates whilst he watches a DVD of the original Human Centipede film, with sandpaper wrapped around his penis, and a sequence later in the film in which he becomes aroused at the sight of the members of the ‘centipede’ being forced to defecate into one another’s mouths, culminating in sight of the man wrapping barbed wire around his penis and raping the woman at the rear of the ‘centipede’. There is little attempt to portray any of the victims in the film as anything other than objects to be brutalised, degraded and mutilated for the amusement and arousal of the central character, as well as for the pleasure of the audience. There is a strong focus throughout on the link between sexual arousal and sexual violence and a clear association between pain, perversity and sexual pleasure. It is the Board’s conclusion that the explicit presentation of the central character’s obsessive sexually violent fantasies is in breach of its Classification Guidelines and poses a real, as opposed to a fanciful, risk that harm is likely to be caused to potential viewers.

David Cooke, Director of the BBFC said: “It is the Board’s carefully considered view that to issue a certificate to this work, even if confined to adults, would be inconsistent with the Board’s Guidelines, would risk potential harm within the terms of the VRA, and would be unacceptable to the public.

“The Board also seeks to avoid classifying material that may be in breach of the Obscene Publications Acts 1959 and 1964 (OPA) or any other relevant legislation. The OPA prohibits the publication of works that have a tendency to deprave or corrupt a significant proportion of those likely to see them. In order to avoid classifying potentially obscene material, the Board engages in regular discussions with the relevant enforcement agencies, including the CPS, the police, and the Ministry of Justice. It is the Board’s view that there is a genuine risk that this video work, The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence), may be considered obscene within the terms of the OPA, for the reasons given above.”

So, not only does Human Centipede II fall afoul of the VRA but David Cooke has also invoked the Obscene Publications Act. The bane of the Dutch porn industry itself. Speaking of which, the first Human Centipede was partly financed in The Netherlands. Conspiracy?

I’m not going to say that this flick sounds like a good time. From this description, I doubt I’m going to be climbing over anyone to get a copy (sandpaper wanks? Seen one, seen ’em all) but in a civilised society surely that should be my decision to make. If you can look past the extreme nature of the events, the basic story does seem like a stroke of post-modernist, self-referential genius. No doubt Six will have a raft of “it’s a satire” arguments ready for his appeal to the Board (hey, it worked for A Serbian Film) and good luck to him. I for one hope he wins, whether it’ll be on my Lovefilm list or not. What do you folks think? Is it art? Is it obscene? Should they “ban this filth now”? Speak up, don’t be shy.

Source: BBFC via Empire

For a quick recap on the original Human Centipede, here’s my earlier review


  1. Stef aka @PrincessofVp · June 8, 2011

    Ok, I didn’t the post again cos it’s a bit stomach-churning (subject matter NOT writing style).

    I think it’s right to be banned. Arguing in favour of censorship is a bit of an unusual position for me but there are times when people need to be protected from things. Yes, this will end up on the internet, let’s face it what doesn’t these days? But that is not the same as the Board saying “Yes, we’re ok with this.”

    I’m sure people will try to argue that this is “art”. It isn’t. This is about standards of decency and morality, a debate which will always rage. I, for one, am in favour of keeping those standards up.

  2. Vanesa Eversmann · December 17, 2011

    A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit of analysis on this. And he actually purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If potential, as you grow to be expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with extra particulars? It is extremely helpful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog publish!

  3. Pingback: 5-Word 365 #120 – The Human Centipede 2 | 5-Word Movie Reviews

Go ahead, punk. Make my day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s